Eastern District IP Cases
- Glencairn IP Holdings Ltd. et al v. Wine-n-Gear
- Lynk Media LLC v. Taylor
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 98.56.189.247
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 98.56.196.191
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.235.124.243
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 75.140.124.77
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 24.10.73.9
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.220.17.77
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 98.208.113.165
- Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.48.220.88
IPWatchdog
Patently-O
- Third-Party Litigation Funding in Patent Cases: Transparency, Ethics, and Policy Concerns
- Pink Ceramic Hip Implants: When Functionality Trumps Trade Dress
- USPTO Terminates Thousands of Chinese-Origin Patent Applications Due to Forged Attorney/Agent Signatures
- Free Post: En Banc Review in Allergan: Rehearing Petition Tackles ODP Safe Harbor and WD Essential Elements
- Supreme Court denies Cert
- Treading Carefully: Federal Circuit Expands “Absolute Litigation Privilege” and Affirms Trade Dress Invalidity in Toyo Tire v. Atturo Tire
- Distinguishing Dastar: False Patent Marking Claims Get New Life Under the Lanham Act
- Secret Springing Prior Art and Inter Partes Review
- Federal Circuit Slices Through Patent Infringement Verdict: A Damage Apportionment Preview
- Diamond in the Rough: Can a Composition of Matter Claim Be an Abstract Idea?
TTABlog
- TTABlog Webinar: Michael Keyes on "Avoiding Consumer Survey Pitfalls at the TTAB"
- TTABlog Test: Three Section 2(d) Appeals – Affirmed or Reversed?
- "Decisions of the Federal Courts and the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board on Registrability Issues July 2023 to August 2024"
- In Second Stage of Cancellation Proceeding, TTAB Deems RASCAL HOUSE Abandoned for Restaurant Services
- TTABlog Test: Which of These Three Section 2(d) Refusals Was/Were Overturned on Appeal?
- TTABlogger Presentation: October 9th -"Meanwhile Back at the TTAB" – All Ohio Annual Institute on Intellectual Property
- Consent Agreement Trumps Other DuPont Factors in Reversal of Section 2(d) Refusal
- TTABlog Webinar: Michael Keyes on "Avoiding Consumer Survey Pitfalls at the TTAB"
- TTABlog Test: Which of These Three Section 2(d) Refusals Was/Were Overturned on Appeal?
- District Court Overturns USPTO’s Genericness Refusal of SPECTACLES for "Smart Glasses"
- "Sunflower in Lapel" for Legal Services Lacks Acquired Distinctiveness, Says TTAB
- Precedential No. 24: TTAB Rejects Law School Amicus Brief, Denies Partial Summary Judgment, and Tosses Out Six Affirmative Defense
- TTABlog Quarterly Index: July – September 2024
- TTAB Posts October 2024 Hearing Schedule