IPWatchdog
Patently-O
- New York City Bar Opinion on Receipt of Inadvertently Sent Documents
- Relating back to the Original Complaint
- Construe Claims First; Then Rule on Eligibility
- “Substantially Equivalent” Disclosure Satisfies Written Description
- Preclusion at the USITC
- Our Product is Lossy and Slow — Therefore we Don’t Infringe
- Patently-O Bits and Bytes by Juvan Bonni
TTABlog
- WORLD'S BEST DOWN Incapable of Functioning as a Trademark for Bedding Containing Down, Says TTAB
- Precedential No. 22: PIERCE-ARROW for Autos Confusable With PIERCE ARROW SOCIETY, Says TTAB
- AIPLA Trademark Roundtable in Boston: Sept. 17th
- TTABlog Test: Are These Two Four-Legged Animal Design Marks Confusable for Clothing?
- TTABlog Test: Are These Two "CANNONBALL" Marks Confusable for Beer?
- TTABlog Test: Is "KP QUIK STOP & Design" Confusable With KWIK STOP for Convenience Stores?